Why is it that over the past century when artists have attempted to grapple with science the results have so often been disappointing?
Is it because the artists have not moved beyond evocation and into understanding? The evocation of that which is not fully comprehended results in work that is, at best, muddled and irrational; at worst, pretentious and obfuscatory.
Witness the current exhibit at Zentrum Paul Klee in Bern: Genesis - Die Kunst Der Schöpfung.
Klee’s own focus on Schöpfung|Creation was driven by his quest to deal with the complexities of modern reality through the exploration of certain basic ‘primal forms.’ Along with Kandinsky and Marc in Der Blaue Reiter group, he aimed to evoke the ’spiritual in art’ by means of primitivism and non-figurative work.
Der Blaue Reiter represented an uncoordinated attempt - the group coalesced in a non-programmatic fashion in response to an exhibit’s rejection of a work of Kandinsky’s - to depict the ’spiritual in art.’ For Kandinsky this was partly achieved by an eccentric fascination with the color blue; the deeper the shade of blue, the more spiritually evocative the work of art. For Klee this was bound up in the idea of pre-existence, of the primal. Klee wrote in his diary:
Art is like creation and is true on the first day and the last… My love is remote and religious. All that is Faustian is remote from me. I occupy a more distant, original point of creation where I presuppose formulae for human beings, animals, plants, stones and earth, fire, water, air and for all circling powers at the same time… Art is a parable of creation. God too did not give himself specifically by fortuitous stages in the present.
Paul Klee, Tagebücher 1898-1918, ed. F. Klee (Cologne, 1957), 196, cited in Karl-Josef Kuschel, Born Before All Time?: The Dispute over Christ’s Origin, trans. John Bowden (New York: Crossroad, 1992), 79.
Klee writes in a proto-Heideggerian preference for being over becoming. Hegel’s Absolute Spirit has been explicitly rejected. Being must be located in the mythical mists of pre-time, of Schöpfung. The artist manipulates pre-existing elements of creation, of being, evoking a primal past. There is here no history and no historical imperative.
The Blue Rider group’s yearning for the ’spiritual’ was at its base a counter-rational hankering after the medieval deus ex machina in the face of the daunting secularity of the twentieth century. It was the world-weary of shrug of the bourgeoisie in the years leading up to the first World War. In music, Schoenberg’s subjectivist serial system and Stravinsky’s hyper-objectivism are both products of the same impotent and anti-humanist impulse. Der Blaue Reiter existed from 1911 to 1914 and ended with the war. Klee painted camouflage on German imperial planes.
Genesis - Die Kunst Der Schöpfung opens with Klee’s Physiognomic genesis.

The year is 1929. Klee has reconstructed Der Blaue Reiter as Die Blaue Vier. His Angelus Novus was completed in 1920; twenty years later, Walter Benjamin, in yet another of his writings more Kabbalist than Marxist, would interpret Angelus as representing progress in history. His interpretation, in his Theses on History, flies in the face of Klee’s own sentiments. For Klee, it is not history, and thus not humanity, which fashions the present. Comprehension of the present and of the spiritual lurking somewhere beneath its surface rests upon our understanding the mythical aetiological elements of Being. We do not create, we are created.
There is thus something suspicious about an exhibit dedicated to genetics and art at the Zentrum Paul Klee. If we are honest, we must admit that for Klee such scientific pursuit is Faustian and not creative. Creation has already occured and we are left tinkering with its elements. We have long since moved from Schöpfung to Fall.
For an artistic understanding of science we must look elsewhere.